Apr 27, 2008, 05:29 AM // 05:29
|
#21
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: a van down by the river
Guild: iBench
Profession: P/W
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Admael
That's nothing! The 1.6kW version of mine has 117A on the +12v rail!
But at 1600W it's only 77% efficient... that's too much wasted electricity.
I need 85% or greater!
|
I can assume you are talking about the Ultra 1600w which does in fact have a 88% effecienty rating. On a standard wall outlet it puts out max at 1300w due to regulations, however on a 220a it will put out max.
pink
|
|
|
Apr 27, 2008, 03:09 PM // 15:09
|
#22
|
rattus rattus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK GMT±0 ±1hr DST
Guild: [GURU]GW [wiki]GW2
Profession: R/
|
Bah, you foreigners and your trifling 110V supplies.
Come to the UK where 240V is where it's at!
Hehe.
__________________
Si non confectus, non reficiat
|
|
|
Apr 27, 2008, 08:01 PM // 20:01
|
#23
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: California
Guild: Xen of Heroes
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Pink57
I can assume you are talking about the Ultra 1600w which does in fact have a 88% effecienty rating. On a standard wall outlet it puts out max at 1300w due to regulations, however on a 220a it will put out max.
pink
|
Really? I didn't spring for it because they told me 79% at max, but around ~80% around 800 (which is what I use)
Here's the chart I looked at before. Maybe this is from a standard outlet?
|
|
|
Apr 30, 2008, 05:12 AM // 05:12
|
#24
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
just sum feedback my 550 watt psu did power up my rig flawlessly, also tested when playin cod4.
|
|
|
Apr 30, 2008, 08:42 AM // 08:42
|
#25
|
rattus rattus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK GMT±0 ±1hr DST
Guild: [GURU]GW [wiki]GW2
Profession: R/
|
Great to hear! Always good to get closure
__________________
Si non confectus, non reficiat
|
|
|
Apr 30, 2008, 04:25 PM // 16:25
|
#27
|
rattus rattus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK GMT±0 ±1hr DST
Guild: [GURU]GW [wiki]GW2
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by my2cent
Just out of curiosity : wat type of rig do u nid to play crysis on very high setting and wont lag ~_~, even with my 8800 GTS 512 sli i lag abit every now and then /swt.
|
A ridiculously overpowered one. Crysis is for next-gen machines. It wants 4 99xx in quad-SLI, the CPU that's due out next year and DDR4.
It was a test on how high they could push graphics - nobody can play it with everything maxed at anything over 40fps.
The following three posts will call me a liar and prove me wrong - I DARES YA!
__________________
Si non confectus, non reficiat
|
|
|
Apr 30, 2008, 06:30 PM // 18:30
|
#28
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stoke, England
Guild: The Godless [GOD]
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snograt
A ridiculously overpowered one. Crysis is for next-gen machines. It wants 4 99xx in quad-SLI, the CPU that's due out next year and DDR4.
It was a test on how high they could push graphics - nobody can play it with everything maxed at anything over 40fps.
The following three posts will call me a liar and prove me wrong - I DARES YA!
|
I completely agree! Even the guys at Crytek stated that no matter what system you run it on in the next year or two they can bring it to it's knees with Crysis.
|
|
|
Apr 30, 2008, 09:33 PM // 21:33
|
#30
|
rattus rattus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK GMT±0 ±1hr DST
Guild: [GURU]GW [wiki]GW2
Profession: R/
|
Bah, where do my SLI'd 8800GTX come on that list?
__________________
Si non confectus, non reficiat
|
|
|
Apr 30, 2008, 09:57 PM // 21:57
|
#31
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
a bit below SLI'd 8800Ultras.
|
|
|
Apr 30, 2008, 11:51 PM // 23:51
|
#32
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
bit higher then 8800GTS 512, but i heard 8800GTS perfromed better than a8800gtx under 1680x1050 reso
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43 AM // 07:43.
|